12

Bob was hired as a senior, but his performance and attendance were subpar at best. This gave Alice (the manager) and me (the team lead) grounds not to extend his contract, which, given the cultural context, is almost synonymous with firing. We informed him of our decision a few months before his contract was due to end.

A while later, he told me that he understood our decision but would like to give his best effort in his last few weeks. His goal was to at least earn a nice reference from us. Most importantly, he mentioned that the reason for his subpar performance was a personal situation that the company's doctor was aware of.

After that conversation, his performance completely turned around. He went from being someone others felt uncomfortable sitting with to a delight to work with. The quiet person suddenly became a major contributor to many discussions, and his energy increased significantly. The team and I are now saddened by his imminent departure. During this time, I also replaced Alice as the manager, which gave me the chance to mentor him more directly. I am now almost confident that he would be an excellent addition to the team.

HR tells me that it is possible to extend his contract for a few months instead of a full year. I'm considering offering him a new contract if he's interested. However, since the law forbids me from probing into his personal situation, I would like to ask him how he sees himself performing if he were to get a new contract. In other words, is he performing this way now because he has a reason (getting a reference for a new job), or because his personal situation is resolved?

How can I have this conversation without getting into his personal situation or questioning his integrity?

6
  • 20
    Did you inform him at anypoint before this that he was performing below your teams expectations?
    – Questor
    Commented yesterday
  • 3
    If I were you, I would just hire him for a new full contract without the need to ask any further questions. Which country are you in ? In your country, is there a law that prohibits a manager from rehiring a contractor for another term (after planning to let him go) ? - I hope there is no such law in any country. Commented 20 hours ago
  • 2
    @Job_September_2020 There are a few countries where you cannot hire someone on limited contracts forever, after a certain amount of limited contracts you have to let them go or take them aboard as a full employee. I don't know if this plays into it though.
    – nvoigt
    Commented 16 hours ago
  • 2
    @Questor Yes, but the sick leave/burnout laws in the Netherlands is so strict that any conversation initiated by the employer that's not carefully planned could potentially trigger a lawsuit. An employee whose performance is hindered due to sickness can't be fired (including not getting a renewal).
    – Kinen
    Commented 15 hours ago
  • 2
    @Kinen "yes, but" means no? If you're so afraid of a lawsuit that you're not able to manage your employees, that's a topic you should tackle.
    – DonQuiKong
    Commented 13 hours ago

3 Answers 3

40

Let's start with an important point. If Bob was capable of working at an acceptable level, but wasn't doing so, then you and Alice messed up by terminating his contract without giving him a chance to fix things, or at least raising the subject with Bob. Neither you nor I know why Bob was doing unsatisfactory work - he may not have known his work was subpar, or he may have thought that the level he was working at was good enough to keep the company happy. In any case, if you had gone to Bob and said "your work isn't as good as we were expecting and if it continues like this we will have to think about terminating your contract" that would very likely have resulted in the improvement you see now, and you wouldn't be in this situation. (I myself have been in a situation where I was perceived as delivering substandard work entirely due to a misunderstanding. Fortunately my boss talked to me before things got serious, and it was trivially fixable.)

There is absolutely nothing stopping you from issuing a new contract, and you are no worse off than you were before if you have to terminate it. You should of course talk to Bob about the change in performance - don't forget to tell him how pleased you are with his work now - and get his explanation of why there was a change and why he wasn't performing before. This may not be due to anything in his personal life. It's up to him to tell you or not if it is personal. Its fine to ask "is there anything in your out-of-work life that is relevant and you want to tell us about", as long as you accept that the answer "no" is final and the end of the discussion.

7
  • 2
    "if you had gone to Bob and said "your work isn't as good as we were expecting and if it continues like this we will have to think about terminating your contract" - We thought of this, of course, but sick leave laws in the Netherlands when a matter gets escalated to the company's doctor is so strict, us doing that at that time could've implicated that we're going to terminate his contract due to his illness, thus putting the company at risk of getting a very unfavourable lawsuit. We did communicate the message through the company's doctor, even though it was not to their liking.
    – Kinen
    Commented 15 hours ago
  • 4
    @Kinen "us doing that at that time could've implicated that we're going to terminate his contract due to his illness, thus putting the company at risk of getting a very unfavourable lawsuit" - Great example of how laws can have unintended and even damaging consequences. Possibly due to the laws not foreseeing all the likely potential situations, not being flexible enough, or not being specific enough. At least that's the first thought that comes to mind here.
    – Mentalist
    Commented 14 hours ago
  • @Mentalist I couldn't agree more. Experts are already calling to revise these laws, as did Sweden. (Article in Dutch) intermediair.nl/werk-privebalans/burn-out/christiaan-vinkers-zweden-diagnose-burn-out-schrappen
    – Kinen
    Commented 14 hours ago
  • @Kinen The fact the company doctor knew about this means you weren't going to be able to avoid the law anyway. Commented 9 hours ago
  • 2
    If the manager and team lead didn't know about the medical issue, how could they be implicated if they raised the performance problem with him? @Kinen
    – Barmar
    Commented 7 hours ago
10

It seems Bob is going above and beyond, and that he doesn't hold any bad blood.

How about something like:

For the last few weeks, your work ethic has been on point, and you've become a valued member of the team. You seem to understand that our previous decision to not renew your contract was due to your performance, a problem you've since fixed, to the point it'd be careless of us to let you go without offering you a x month renewal of your contract.

With a few key points:

  • Will he care about a less than 6 months contract? If he is such a good employee, what's stopping you (the company, not you personally) from offering him a full time position? Personally, I would find "you're such a good employee, please stay for another month" to be a bit insulting.
  • What happens in x months? His new contract expires, and then what?
  • He still might refuse, and there is nothing you can do about it.
  • It seems Bob has become irreplaceable and he might recognize that. What happens if he agrees to stay, but only with a raise? I would find this improper, but considering his previous option was getting let go, he might still try the gamble.
6

Can the company willfully terminate a contract due to performance? If so, it seems like your questions are irrelevant - let Bob know how well he's doing, that his recent performance is the reason that you are renewing his contract, and that if he keeps it up he won't have to worry. If he slides again, no big deal - terminate the contract early.

Even if that is not an option, I'm still not sure there's a point in asking these questions. Bob would never have a reason to tell you he thinks he might not perform well if you give him a new contract. My advice is to trust that he will keep performing well and make sure you keep giving him the support needed to make it so.

Also, if his contract is renewed for only a few months than he still needs to perform well for a future recommendation/review, right?

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.